Bishops to House of Representatives: Fix Flaws or Vote No on Health Reform Bill

March 21, 2010

As Congress is set to vote on the Health Reform Bill, the US Bishops again are urging the House to fix the serious flaws in the bill, or to vote “NO” if the flaws are not fixed.  The bishops are raising three key issues about the House:

1.  House leadership is ignoring pro-life members for essential changes in the legislation

2.  House leadership won’t even try to address the serious problems on abortion funding

3.  House leadership is ignoring conscience protection and fair treatment of immigrants.

The full text of the statement is as follows:

“The U.S. bishops urged the House of Representatives to fix flaws in health care legislation or vote against its passage in a March 20 letter to House members. The letter was signed by Cardinal Daniel DiNardo of Galveston-Houston, chair of the Committee on Pro-Life Activities, Bishop William Murphy of Rockville Centre, New York, chair of the Committee on Domestic Justice and Human Development, and Bishop John Wester of Salt Lake City, chair on the Committee on Migration. The letter follows. 

“Dear Representative:

“For decades, the United States Catholic bishops have supported universal health care. The Catholic Church teaches that health care is a basic human right, essential for human life and dignity. Our community of faith provides health care to millions, purchases health care for tens of thousands and addresses the failings of our health care system in our parishes, emergency rooms and shelters. This is why we as bishops continue to insist that health care reform which truly protects the life, dignity, consciences and health of all is a moral imperative and urgent national priority.

“We are convinced that the Senate legislation now presented to the House of Representatives on a “take it or leave it” basis sadly fails this test and ought to be opposed. Why do we take this position, when we have a long record of support for health care reform? Our fundamental objections can be summarized in two points:

“1.  Health care reform must protect life and conscience, not threaten them. The Senate bill extends abortion coverage, allows federal funds to pay for elective abortions (for example, through a new appropriation for services at Community Health Centers that bypasses the Hyde amendment), and denies adequate conscience protection to individuals and institutions. Needed health care reform must keep in place the longstanding and widely supported federal policy that neither elective abortion nor plans which include elective abortion can be paid for with federal funds. Simply put, health care reform ought to continue to apply both parts of the Hyde amendment, no more and no less. The House adopted this policy by a large bipartisan majority, establishing the same protections that govern Medicaid, SCHIP, the Federal Employee Health Benefits Program and other federal health programs. 

“Despite claims to the contrary, the status quo prohibits the federal government from funding or facilitating plans that include elective abortion. The Senate bill clearly violates this prohibition by providing subsidies to purchase such plans. The House bill provided that no one has to pay for other people’s abortions, while this Senate bill does not. While the Senate provides for one plan without abortion coverage in each exchange, those who select another plan in an exchange to better meet the special needs of their families will be required to pay a separate mandatory abortion fee into a fund exclusively for abortions. This new federal requirement is a far more direct imposition on the consciences of those who do not wish to pay for the destruction of unborn human life than anything currently in federal law.

“It is not those who require that the Hyde Amendment be fully applied who are obstructing reform, since this is the law of the land and the will of the American people. Rather, those who insist on expanding  federal participation in abortion, require people to pay for other people’s abortions, and refuse to incorporate essential conscience protections (both within and beyond the abortion context) are threatening genuine reform. With conscience protection as with abortion funding, our goal is simply to preserve the status quo. 

“2.  Universal coverage should be truly universal. People should never be denied coverage because they can’t afford it, because of where they live or work, or because of where they come from and when they got here. The Senate bill would not only continue current law that denies legal immigrants access to Medicaid for five years, but also prohibit undocumented immigrants from buying insurance for their families in the exchanges using their own money. These provisions could leave immigrants and their families worse off, and also hurt the public health of our nation.

“Now, after a year of divisive political combat, members of the House are told that they can advance health care reform only by adopting the Senate legislation as is, including these fundamental flaws. The House leadership is ignoring the pleas of pro-life members for essential changes in the legislation. Apparently they will not even try to address the serious problems on abortion funding, conscience protection and fair treatment of immigrants.

“We are bishops, not politicians, policy experts or legislative tacticians. We are also pastors, teachers, and citizens. At this point of decision, we cannot compromise on basic moral principles. We can only urge — and hope and pray — that the House of Representatives will still find the will and the means to adopt health care reform that protects the life, dignity, conscience and health of all. The legislation the House adopted, while not perfect, came closer to meeting these criteria. The Senate legislation simply does not meet them.

“With deep regret, but clear in our moral judgment, we are compelled to continue to urge House members to oppose the Senate bill unless these fundamental flaws are remedied. At this critical moment, we urge Representatives to take the steps necessary to ensure that health care reform respects the life and dignity of all, from conception to natural death.”

Bishops Urge Congress – Vote NO on Current Healthcare Reform Bill

March 19, 2010

The US Bishops issued a statement on March 15 urging Congress to stop the current healthcare bill.  Most people agree we need healthcare reform and the bishops have been key advocates of reform.  But the current bill is severely flawed and needs to be rewritten.  The text of the bishops’ statement is below:

“The Cost is too High; the Loss is too Great”

“The Catholic Bishops of the United States have long and consistently advocated for the reform of the American health care system. Their experience in health care and in Catholic parishes has acquainted them with the anguish of mothers who are unable to afford prenatal care, of families unable to ensure quality care for their children, and of those who cannot obtain insurance because of preexisting conditions.

“Throughout the discussion on health care over the last year, the bishops have advocated a bipartisan approach to solving our national health care needs. They have urged that all who are sick, injured or in need receive necessary and appropriate medical assistance, and that no one be deliberately killed through an expansion of federal funding of abortion itself or of insurance plans that cover abortion. These are the provisions of the long standing Hyde amendment, passed annually in every federal bill appropriating funds for health care; and surveys show that this legislation reflects the will of the majority of our fellow citizens. The American people and the Catholic bishops have been promised that, in any final bill, no federal funds would be used for abortion and that the legal status quo would be respected.

“However, the bishops were left disappointed and puzzled to learn that the basis for any vote on health care will be the Senate bill passed on Christmas Eve. Notwithstanding the denials and explanations of its supporters, and unlike the bill approved by the House of Representatives in November, the Senate bill deliberately excludes the language of the Hyde amendment. It expands federal funding and the role of the federal government in the provision of abortion procedures. In so doing, it forces all of us to become involved in an act that profoundly violates the conscience of many, the deliberate destruction of unwanted members of the human family still waiting to be born.

“What do the bishops find so deeply disturbing about the Senate bill? The points at issue can be summarized briefly.  The status quo in federal abortion policy, as reflected in the Hyde Amendment, excludes abortion from all health insurance plans receiving federal subsidies. In the Senate bill, there is the provision that only one of the proposed multi-state plans will not cover elective abortions – all other plans (including other multi-state plans) can do so, and receive federal tax credits. This means that individuals or families in complex medical circumstances will likely be forced to choose and contribute to an insurance plan that funds abortions in order to meet their particular health needs.

“Further, the Senate bill authorizes and appropriates billions of dollars in new funding outside the scope of the appropriations bills covered by the Hyde amendment and similar provisions. As the bill is written, the new funds it appropriates over the next five years, for Community Health Centers for example (Sec. 10503), will be available by statute for elective abortions, even though the present regulations do conform to the Hyde amendment. Regulations, however, can be changed at will, unless they are governed by statute.

“Additionally, no provision in the Senate bill incorporates the longstanding and widely supported protection for conscience regarding abortion as found in the Hyde/Weldon amendment. Moreover, neither the House nor Senate bill contains meaningful conscience protection outside the abortion context. Any final bill, to be fair to all, must retain the accommodation of the full range of religious and moral objections in the provision of health insurance and services that are contained in current law, for both individuals and institutions.

“This analysis of the flaws in the legislation is not completely shared by the leaders of the Catholic Health Association. They believe, moreover, that the defects that they do recognize can be corrected after the passage of the final bill. The bishops, however, judge that the flaws are so fundamental that they vitiate the good that the bill intends to promote. Assurances that the moral objections to the legislation can be met only after the bill is passed seem a little like asking us, in Midwestern parlance, to buy a pig in a poke.

“What is tragic about this turn of events is that it needn’t have happened. The status quo that has served our national consensus and respected the consciences of all with regard to abortion is the Hyde amendment. The House courageously included an amendment applying the Hyde policy to its Health Care bill passed in November. Its absence in the Senate bill and the resulting impasse are not an accident. Those in the Senate who wanted to purge the Hyde amendment from this national legislation are obstructing the reform of health care.

“This is not quibbling over technicalities. The deliberate omission in the Senate Bill of the necessary language that could have taken this moral question off the table and out of play leaves us still looking for a way to meet the President’s and our concern to provide health care for those millions whose primary care physician is now an emergency room doctor. As Pope Benedict told Ambassador to the Holy See Miguel H. Diaz when he presented his credentials as the United States government’s representative to the Holy See, there is ‘an indissoluble bond between an ethic of life and every other aspect of social ethics.’

“Two basic principles, therefore, continue to shape the concerns of the Catholic bishops: health care means taking care of the health needs of all, across the human life span; and the expansion of health care should not involve the expansion of abortion funding and of polices forcing everyone to pay for abortions. Because these principles have not been respected, despite the good that the bill under consideration intends or might achieve, the Catholic bishops regretfully hold that it must be opposed unless and until these serious moral problems are addressed.”


US Bishops Ask President Obama to Allow Haitians to Come to the US

January 15, 2010

In a letter sent to president Barack Obama on Friday, January 15, Cardinal Francis George of Chicago, president of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, asked the White House to designate the country of Haiti for Temporary Protected Status (TPS).

            “It is clear that Haiti merits an immediate designation of TPS after suffering the devastating 7.0 magnitude earthquake of January 12, one of the worst in Haitian history,” Cardinal George said in the letter. 

TPS permits nationals of a designated nation living in the United States to reside here legally and qualify for work authorization. TPS designation is based upon determination that armed conflict, political unrest, environmental disaster, or other extraordinary and temporary conditions exist in a nation and that the return of that country’s nationals would further destabilize the nation and potentially bring harm to those returned. 

Cardinal George said that “it is important that Haitians in the United States are allowed to receive legal status and obtain work authorization, as a designation of TPS would provide.  These Haitians then would be better able to assist their families in Haiti through remittances and by working together as a community to garner other resources for their stricken homeland.”

Citing the language contained in the statute itself, Cardinal George urged the President to act on this matter.

“[B]y any measure, the conditions in Haiti meet the statutory requirements for TPS… Extending this mantle of protection to struggling Haiti is not only appropriate, but a just, compassionate, and concrete step the United States can take toward alleviating the human suffering of the Haitian people.”


Vatican Dips Its Toes in the World of Social Networking

June 9, 2009

The Vatican has a new website called Pope2You.net   The site has a link to a Facebook page where you can send a prayer for the sick, send a virtual postcard to others, download messages from the Pope, and sign up for future emails.  Notably missing is the “wall” where visitors can write comments and interact with each other.

The site also offers links to send video and audio downloads of Vatican news to your iPhone or iPod Touch.

A link is also provided for the Vatican’s YouTube channel which was launched earlier.

Another link on the site offers an intriguing format.  The link is for “WikiCath” which the site claims is an interactive way, using wiki-technology, to read the Pope’s message on the World Day of Communication.  This section breaks up the message into parts and provides links to background information on key words and phrases.  I am reminded of the North American Commentary to the Code of Canon Law which also provides background information to key parts of each canon.  So often you learn much more from reading the commentary than just reading the Code alone.

WikiCath amazingly invites comments.  Currently, when you click on the comment button, an email message appears indicating that your comments will be sent via email, and thus won’t be posted.  The Italian bishops’ conference is helping the Vatican to work with this site.

I have to smile as I watch the Vatican start to use new technology for communication.  I think it’s great!   I smile because it is such a cautious, exploratory attempt.  And I have to be honest in admitting that I am also a “newbie” in some of these technology areas and thus also tread cautiously when trying these technologies.  Every step forward is definitely welcome.  The challenge will come, in my opinion, in the missing step that so many young people around the world take so easily.  That step is opening up one’s site so that visitors’ comments are visible to all, and thus encourage interaction.  

Not everyone is ready for this step and I can’t blame them.  I still don’t totally understand the allure for young people of posting their daily lives and friends’ comments on a site that is open to the public.  Yet, it would definitely be intriguing to visit a Vatican site where the public could post comments and interact on any given topic.  Maybe we’re not ready for that yet.  But given these first steps using Facebook, YouTube, WikiCath, and the iPhone, one can only hope.




Advent Calendar for Adults

December 9, 2008

The US Bishops’ Conference has developed an online Advent calendar for adults. The site includes daily prayers, readings and reflections. It also sometimes includes audio and video clips. It’s a simple way to take a few moments each day to prepare for the coming Christmas season.



US Bishops Speak of Solidarity during Economic Crisis

November 12, 2008

Meeting in Baltimore for their semi-annual gathering, the US bishops issued a statement addressing the economic crisis on Nov. 11, 2008.  Titled, Solidarity at a Time of Economic Crisis, this brief statement reminds people that we are “our brothers’ and sisters’ keepers.”  The statement was delivered by the President, Cardinal Francis George, OMI of Chicago.  The text is included below.  Additional information about the meeting is available here.

“As the Catholic bishops of the United States gather in Baltimore and as servants of Jesus our hope, we bring with us our concern for people in our dioceses, and we want to express our active support and solidarity with all those who are being hurt by the current economic crisis.  As pastors and bishops, we see the many human and moral consequences of this crisis. Clearly, the impact is greater in some regions than others.  However, across our nation families are losing their homes; retirement savings are threatened; workers are losing jobs and health care; and many people are losing a sense of hope and security.

“This disturbing and complicated situation brings home a universal truth; we are all children of God. We are our brothers’ and sisters’ keepers.  We are all in this together.  Hard times can isolate us or they can bring us together.  The Catholic community will continue to reach out to those in need, stand with those who are hurt, and work for policies that bring greater compassion, accountability and justice to economic life.

“Pope Benedict XVI has outlined our goals in his 2008 World Day of Peace message: ‘The family needs to have a home, employment, and a just recognition of the domestic activity of parents, the possibility of schooling for children, and basic health care for all.’  He also insists that society and public policy should be ‘commited to assisting the family in these areas.’

“We offer our prayers for the families and individuals, our sisters and brothers, who are hurting, anxious or discouraged in these difficult times. We also pledge our prayers for our wounded nation and suffering world. We pray that, working together, we can find courage, wisdom and ways to build an economy of prosperity and greater justice for all.”


Vatican’s Synod of Bishops on the Word of God in the Life and Mission of the Church – Oct 2008

October 9, 2008

On Sunday, October 5, 2008, the latest Synod of Bishops began at the Vatican.  It will continue until October 26. 

A Synod is a gathering of bishops representing Catholics from around the world.  Each country’s bishops’ conference elects bishop-delegates to represent them.  In addition, there are experts selected from the laity, religious, ordained, and from specific organizations.   A Synod is called by the Pope to focus on a specific topic of discussion.  The theme of the current Synod is the Bible, or more specifically, “The Word of God in the Life and Mission of the Church.”  The last Synod, on the Eucharist, was held in 2005.

The US bishops’ conference has established a website that gives an overview of US participants.  The Vatican also has a website, but they have taken a very unique and exciting step.  They are issuing daily bulletins that list the specific comments made by Synod delegates.  This is amazing.  As part of the normal Synod process, bishops and other experts give a brief presentation of their thoughts on this topic.  Usually, the media captures a few quotes.  But thanks to technology, all Catholics and other interested people can now read what every delegate is saying about the topic.  Just go to the Vatican website, scroll down and click on one of the dates listed under the “Index of interventions by participants.”  Note that several bulletins are sometimes issued in one day, and that 09.10.2008 means October 9, 2008.

In browsing through the interventions, or short speeches, made so far, it is fascinating to read how many are focusing on the need to improve preaching in our parishes.  Even Pope John Paul II’s former secretary who is now the Cardinal in Krakow, Poland, Cardinal Stanislaw Dziwisz, points out how seminaries need to improve their training on preaching.  As he comments, “Sometimes it seems that candidates to the priesthood treat the texts of the Sacred Scriptures as an object of study without taking into account its spiritual dimension.  For them, the Scripture does not become the Word of their life.”

Cardinal George, Archbishop of Chicago notes that “If the power of God’s word in Holy Scripture is to be felt in the life and mission of the Church, pastors must attend to personal context as well as inspired text.”

Bishop Kicanas, Diocese of Tucson, Arizona, made a fascinating proposal during his first intervention.  Also focusing on the need to have the Word come alive in preaching, he asked the following questions:  “What if, after this Year of St. Paul, the Church Universal focused a year on preaching in the Eucharistic assembly? What if, in that year of preaching, priests and deacons together with their bishop studied what matters in order to preach better? What if, in that year of preaching, priests and deacons with their bishop met with the laity to listen to their struggles? They could discuss how preaching might inspire the laity to be a leaven for the world, bringing the Gospel values to the questions of the times. What if, in that year of preaching, there would be a thorough exploration of the catechetical potential of the Sunday homily? If all these “what ifs” were realized then the new springtime for Christianity about which the Holy Father speaks could burst forth and bloom throughout the Church, renewing the Church, strengthening evangelization, intensifying catechesis, and enhancing discipleship.”

The fact that the Vatican is publishing all of these comments almost immediately on the internet is already a sign of a new blossoming in the Church.  Rather than having a Synod occur behind-the-scenes, with a report printed later and a short news article making it to the diocesan newspapers, Catholics everywhere can now take part in the ongoing discussions almost as if we were in Rome as official observers.  This is a significant step and an opportunity we should not miss.


Excellent New Book – What Happened at Vatican II

October 7, 2008

When I watched the TV mini-series, John Adams, I was amazed at how messy the start of our country had been.  It is so easy to read history books and assume that the delegates from the thirteen colonies were all like-minded collaborators who gathered as a team to purposely draft the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.  The television program gave a glimpse into how difficult the process actually was, with people pulling in different directions and with no clear vision of where the group was heading.  Such is one of the gifts of John O’Malley, SJ’s new book, What Happened at Vatican II

This book offers a fascinating glimpse into what really occurred during this historic Catholic event of our time.  It’s almost funny to read that the calling of a Council was a shock to almost everyone.  “What was the Pope thinking?!” many wondered.  As the book explains, there were no obvious, major crises in the Church.  So why would the Pope decide to convene such a milestone event?  Usually Councils were convened to address heresies or other crises. 

Filled with interesting tidbits, this book at times reads like a novel.  But there are so many facts woven together that it becomes an enlightening account of the often messy, often disjointed, but definitely Spirit-led gathering.  O’Malley doesn’t dive deeply into the theological issues, since these are covered in many other books. But he gives enough information that the average Catholic will find this account extremely helpful.  

I’ve heard people say that they would have loved to have been a “fly on the wall” at Vatican II.  This book comes as close as possible to that.  It’s a great book for every curious Catholic to read.



Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.